Infographic Template Galleries

Created with Fabric.js 1.4.5 consectetur adipicising elit, sed do euismodtempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehendrerit in voluptate velit esse 1991-1996 LOREM IPSUM DOLOR 1996-2002 LOREM IPSUM DOLOR SIT AMET Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipicising elit, sed do euismod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehendrerit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat e-mailtephonewebsitesocial network 1network 2network 3 Fallacies of Argument Fallacies of Emotional Argument Fallacies of Ethical Argument Fallacies of Logical Argument Scare Tactics------------Fear tactics can be usedbecause people tend to behaveand act rationally because ofbeing scared or worried abouta potential outcome of a situation. Either-Or Choices----------------This is a method of simplifyinga situation to one of two possibleoptions, purposely creating one of theseoptions superior to the other to convince someoneit is the more moral or "correct" course ofaction. Slippery Slope-------------Almost considered a scare tacticin its own, the Slippy Slope can be usedto describe a small issue as thepotential or immenent causation of amuch more large-scale problem. Typically,writers who implement this will use thisfallcy despite whether the argument mightcause a larger problem at all. Overly Sentimental Appeals------------------------Focuses on the use of strong emotional language, typically tender, that will inducefeelings of passion and guilt in itsaudience. Bandwagon Appeals------------------This fallacy uses the "everyone elseis doing it, so why aren't you?" path.Rather than independant thinking, manyfollow fads and bandwagons on eventhe smallest things, making for a veryuseful and effective use of persuasionfor a fallacy of an argument. Appeal to False Authority------------------------When people accept claims as the truth, despite credibility Dogmatism----------When a writer exerts and provides (sometimes)biased evidence proving how one positionis more acceptable as the others Ad Hominem ("To the man")-----------Direct attacks at the character, claims, andvalidity of the opponents ownership, destroyingor disrupting their ability to sufficiently argue Stacking the Deck------------------An arguer will "stack the deck" (or fix the argument)in their favor by presenting only one side of the argument more favorable orpractical towards their bias opinion Hasty Generalization-------------------An inference or conclusion based on aninsufficient amount of evidence Faulty Casuality---------------The fallacy in which one event will cause another,affecting the following action which will become thesource of causation of the next event, and so on Begging the Question------------------The fallacy in which the claim cannot be supported and is in questionbecause the claim's grounds themselves are in question Equivocation-----------When false-truths or arguments themselvescreate notions that give lies an honest and trustworthyappearance Non Sequitur-----------An argument in which all claims,warrants, reasons, or any supportingevidence does not connect logically Straw Man----------Creating an argument that was never there. Thisis so the opponent is able to "knock down" the other partyand make them seem like the "bigger man," so to speak. This makes it easy for them to counterargue because they usually havea counterarguement prepared Red Herring----------A method of throwing off the readers or audience. This can either be done byintroducing an anecdote effectively, another argument, oreven backfire and leave the audience lost and confused depending on how well it is executed tap and hold to changethis text!
Create Your Free Infographic!